This was written on January 7, for what it’s worth:
We are now tens of thousands of feet in the air, 4 AM India time, flying over central Asia. Getting to this point involved an absurd process. We didn't realize, when we separated from Dave's family briefly to check in to our flight that the attendant put us in non-sequential seats. Dave has 19J and I have 19K. Saumya had 19E. Even though we bought the tickets together and paid for A, B, and C. And the person at the gate had zero tolerance to even the idea of trying to be useful or at least sympathetic. She was rude and abrupt, saying no change is possible (even though it is the airline's fault, not ours). She said it was our fault (excellent move!) for not catching their mistake earlier. Not that that would have made any much difference, I don't think. We sit at the gate and stew and go over our options. Quietly we load our rifles of anger with the ammunition of injustice. Peeved, we rehearse our lines: We paid all this money to go all this way and we wanted to sit together and they changed it and it's their fault and someone needs to fix this and why is “customer service” so bad in India and why is it not even customer service, but “annoyance management,” for the employees here, since a problem is something they have to “deal with” instead of fix? And so on and so on.
At Saumya's insistence, we board the plane as quickly as possible and take the two seats we know we've got, and the seat we think we should have, 19H. Saumya thinks squatters rights may have some currency in the battle ahead. She explains to the flight attendant the situation, that we were misbooked, that we paid to sit together, that she is (is) going to sit here, and it's their fault and they need to fix it. Voices are raised, tensions are high. Dave and I chip in what meager support we can give. We say the error was made by the woman who checked us in at the check-in desk. The flight attendant pulls an awesome card none of us were expecting. “That person who checked you in at the Air India desk – with the orange vest (Air India's colors)? That person does not work for Air India.”
Wha-hut? Classic. Excellent move, sir. This is the “There is no Cherai Beach” move. Deny the customer an ability to exist in the same plane of reality as the rest of humanity. Warp the dimensions of space and time based on a perspectivity of chaos and uncertainty. It's Kafka-esque. The airline that checked you in, the airline you got your tickets from and whose plane you are sitting on now – that is not the airline that we are. We? Who is 'we' anymore? The non-check-in part of Air India? Is he saying that they have outsourced their check-in process to a subcontractor not formally associated with their airline and thus abdicate any and all responsibility for the process where by their passengers will check their luggage and board their plane? On what space-time continuum do you exist, dude?
As these shockwaves blast through our three collective minds and we reel in existential doubt about the reliability of reality as we have so far perceived it, the flight attendant leaves us. The departing jinn offers one kernel of hope: if the person whose (aisle) seat we are taking is willing to switch, then we can do that. Saumya says that this point is irrelevant. She paid for three seats together and is taking three seats together. She is staying put and they will have to deal with it. Such sheer willpower and unflinching assertiveness, I am learning, is what it takes to get things done in this country. Dave warns against being physically removed from the flight by security (a dramatic end to this escalating arms race between Air India and Team Roedl-Verma-Orvin) while I quietly bet that the person who has that aisle seat will be much more reasonable that the stubborn bureaucracy of this airline.
The unlucky winner does eventually find us, this well-dressed young Indian man with speaks with almost no trace of any accent other than American English. He listens to Saumya's genuine plea but does ask incredulously, “You want to trade me my aisle seat for your middle seat?” He shrugs and is a good guy who takes one for the team, and goes to the middle seat. We celebrate by planning to buy him a drink once we get in the air.
Since his row (across the aisle from us) is not fully yet, he sits on the aisle until the person in that aisle seat comes. I think we're in the clear, as it passes 2 AM and no one has taken that seat. We all win: he gets the aisle seat he wanted and we get to sit together.
But then there are some late boarders, who had delayed connections and trouble at immigration, who board and sure enough that aisle seat he wanted is actually taken by a man who is boarding with his wife who is in a green and blue sari. Reluctantly our friend is bumped to the middle seat. The man takes the aisle, and the woman takes the aisle seat in front of him.
It could not have been five minutes later that the woman stands up and politely asks our savior to switch seats with her. She would like the middle seat to sit next to her husband. Looks like Air India is in the habit of splitting up more couples than a divorce attorney. He more than happily obliges, and so balance, order and harmony is restored in the universe, like a Shakespearean comedy: our three-person party has their consecutive seats, the stylish Indian American has his aisle seat and the late-boarding couple has their consecutive seats. Let's all celebrate with a six-person wedding? All in spite of the best efforts of Air India to fuck up everything, somehow, It All Worked Out in the End.
Which gets to a larger point about how things are “difficult” in India. That is the word Saumya's Dad used (who is from here), and which we saw in full focus on our three week trip. There is just a great deal of hassle. Things change and people don't take responsibility and there is no sense of customer service, and the terms of any agreement seem to always be in flux. There have been at least four or five occasions on this trip where that has happened. Screaming matches about who is the most right. You said one thing, now you're saying another thing. You said we would have the use of the van the whole time, now you're saying you clock out at 5 pm. You said breakfast was complimentary, now you're saying we have to pay 350 rupees per person (That's a $7 breakfast in a country where we had a sit-down dinner for a group of 12 for less than $90.) You said we had this block of these three seats and now we don't? And on and on. Everyone has to be challenged. Everything becomes a confrontation, a match of wills, an argument. And it's kind of exhausting. You agree to certain things, those things change without reason or notification and then you have to fight and yell for them to go back to the terms we originally agreed upon.
This is certainly an issue in the US (I am thinking: cell phone companies, airlines, internet providers), but I don't think it's on such a scale and over such trivial things as in the US. I think there is a stronger sense of customer service in the US. We've gotten some pretty atrocious service in India. For example, one evening at a nice restaurant in a fancy hotel, our meal took over an hour to come out. We asked several servers what was going on and by the third or fourth time we asked, the waiter simply silently gave Saumya a “stop” sign with his hand and walked away. Unbelievable. That about set me through the roof (as a former waiter). Even when we talked to the manager, he never apologized for the rudeness of his staff or the lateness of our food. He only listened and seemed embarrassed, but he didn't do anything to make it better. He didn't comp us dessert or take 10% off the bill, even though Saumya dropped the name of a powerful uncle or two who were shuttling us around to his favorite hotels and restaurants in southern India (including this one).
Is this a cultural thing? Am I just missing something entirely? Part of me really dislikes the “Oh it's a cultural thing” argument because it seems cheap and simplistic. But maybe it really is. Different cultures approach life differently, and maybe this scrappy aggressiveness is inherently more useful than a passive acquiescence in a crowded, busy country. Or maybe we Americans are too thin-skinned when it comes to this stuff: if we were raised to expect conflict and to thrive on it, it would not be nearly as uncomfortable as we often find it. So maybe Indians see no problem with this kind of habitual confrontation. I approached India with American assumptions about being served as a customer and was showed a different perspective. I think that challenge to my assumptions will be ultimately beneficial, and may even help me appreciate what we have here.
Or maybe these are the dejected musings of a burned-out traveler, through this flight of sixteen hours of darkness, this one slowly rolling night, with one destination in mind – home.